You sell protection. Your own data needs it too.

Insurance carriers, agencies, and MGAs hold some of the most sensitive personal and financial data in any industry. Regulators know it. Attackers know it. Your IT and security program needs to reflect that reality.

Talk to Our Team

The regulatory pressure on insurance IT is only increasing.

State insurance regulators have been tightening data security requirements for years. The NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law has been adopted across dozens of states, requiring carriers and licensed entities to implement formal security programs, conduct risk assessments, and maintain documented controls. At the same time, the sheer volume of personal data insurance organizations hold — health records, financial histories, claims data — makes them attractive targets. The combination of regulatory obligation and real threat exposure means "good enough" IT stopped being an option a long time ago.

The coverage your operations need. One partner.

Risk Assessment

Regulatory-Grade Documentation

Comprehensive security risk assessments mapped to NIST CSF and aligned to NAIC requirements. Technical scanning, administrative review, and prioritized remediation — built to survive regulatory review.
Managed Security

Continuous Monitoring

Vulnerability management, threat detection, and security event monitoring. Ongoing visibility into your environment with the documentation regulators expect.
Managed IT

Infrastructure You Can Rely On

End-to-end IT management for carriers, agencies, and MGAs. Cloud, endpoint, network — with compliance considerations built in from the start, not patched in later.
Compliance Support

Audit-Ready at All Times

We maintain the controls, documentation, and evidence trail that regulatory exams require. No scramble before an examination — because the work is ongoing.

Regulators aren’t asking whether you have a security program. They’re asking to see it.

State insurance departments have moved from general expectations to specific requirements. Documentation, testing, board reporting, third-party oversight — the bar has risen. Organizations that built their security posture proactively are handling regulatory exams without disruption. Those that didn’t are finding remediation under scrutiny is a much harder problem to solve.

Risk assessments need to be current, documented, and tied to actual remediation — not a one-time exercise from three years ago.
Incident response plans need to be tested, not just written. Regulators are starting to ask for evidence of testing.
Third-party vendors need to be assessed — not just listed in a policy document.
Board and executive reporting on security posture is increasingly required — which means someone needs to build and maintain what gets reported.

Security that matches what your license requires.

If your security program was built around what was convenient rather than what regulators actually expect — let’s close that gap before an examination does it for you.

Start a Conversation

Or call us directly: 303.756.9401 — Option 2